+- 包子吧 - 我的帖子我做主！ (https://baozi8.com)
+-- 版块： 求职大典 (https://baozi8.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- 版块： 面经分享 (https://baozi8.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- 主题： behavior question #11 (/showthread.php?tid=291)
behavior question #11 - 000 - 10-10-2024
### **Behavioral Question:**
**"Tell me about a time when you had to redesign or rework a machine learning model due to unexpected challenges. How did you approach the situation, and what was the final outcome?"**
### **Good Example Answer:**
"During a project to build a recommendation engine for a retail client, we initially designed a collaborative filtering model based on user interaction data. However, after deployment, the model’s performance was lower than expected—particularly for users with sparse interaction history. This led to irrelevant recommendations for a significant portion of the user base.
I knew we needed a different approach, so I gathered the team to analyze the model’s performance and data patterns. We identified the cold-start problem as the key issue—new or less active users weren’t receiving meaningful recommendations. To address this, I proposed a hybrid model that combined collaborative filtering with content-based filtering, leveraging product metadata and user demographics to fill in the gaps for those users.
We set up an A/B testing framework to compare the performance of the new hybrid model against the original one. While doing this, I kept stakeholders informed about the change in strategy and adjusted the project timeline to accommodate the additional work. My team and I worked closely to fine-tune the feature engineering process, ensuring the content-based features were relevant and didn’t introduce noise into the system.
The hybrid model significantly improved the recommendation quality, especially for new users, and we saw a 15% increase in click-through rates during the A/B tests. This approach not only solved the immediate cold-start issue but also made the recommendation engine more robust to user variability. The project reinforced the importance of flexibility in model design and the need to constantly reassess assumptions based on real-world data."
---
### **What You Should Not Say:**
1. **"I stuck with the original model even though it wasn’t performing well and just tried to tweak the parameters."**
- Shows resistance to adapting to new challenges and a lack of problem-solving creativity.
2. **"I didn’t analyze why the model wasn’t working and moved on to a new technique without understanding the root cause."**
- Reflects poor troubleshooting skills and a failure to diagnose underlying issues.
3. **"I made changes to the model on my own without discussing with the team or getting input from stakeholders."**
- Suggests poor collaboration and communication, which can lead to misaligned goals or unexpected issues down the road.
4. **"I didn’t test the new approach properly and deployed it without measuring performance improvements."**
- Demonstrates a lack of attention to validation and testing, which is critical in machine learning workflows.
5. **"I didn’t keep the client or stakeholders informed about the changes and only updated them after the model was live."**
- Fails to keep stakeholders in the loop, which can lead to dissatisfaction or misaligned expectations if the change doesn’t deliver results.